RSS
 

Scams: Lessons Learned

23 Mar

After leaving home over 20 years ago, I guess I can consider myself an adult at this point.  Here are some lessons I have learned:

Scams:
Multi blade ‘fancy’ razors. They cost way way too much and don’t shave any better.  Go online and get a double edged safety razor and blades.  The blades cost about 15 cents each and last just as long.  You may have to relearn shaving, but about about two or three shaves, you will actually prefer them.

“Service” plans. All these plans do is make money for the store selling them.  With the exception of fine jewellery rings, they are a complete waste.  In 21 years of buying electronics, I have had ONE device fail that would of been covered by a service plan.  The item cost about $80.  I figure I have said no to about $10,000 in service plans.  No way in hell is there any way I would of recouped any of that cost.

Paying more than 0.9% for an auto loan.  If you have good credit, you should pay 0 or close to 0%.  Anything more, look for another dealer.

Cleaning your apartment when you move.  Don’t bother, they will always find something wrong and get some or all of your deposit.  Just leave it, they will have a professional crew come in an clean it anyway.

Mortgage brokers. They are not in your best interest and are generally just schmucks. Go directly to your bank. A lot less paperwork and you will get a competitive rate.

Eating out. It is a good treat to reward yourself, but monetarily and health wise, you would do much better to head to the local grocery store. You can save thousands of dollars a year (and a lot of health issues) learning to cook and eat at home.

“Luxury” watches and jewellery. I am a collector of watches. If you go into a store and they call them ‘timepieces’ be prepared to be separated from a lot of money. Only Rolex has the gall to charge $6,000 for a steel, three handed watch, with no date. If you want to be cheap, stick with Timex. If you want something to last AND look good for
decades, go with Seiko. With jewellery, ignore the sale price percentages and really ask yourself, is it really worth how much they are charging?

Speciality household cleaners. Turns out that you really only need about 3 cleaners; Perfume and dye free dish detergent. Used for cleaning just about everything, including the sink, toilet, even your hands. Works great. All purpose cleaner than can clean glass. Does just about everything else. And, finally vinegar and baking soda, for the really hard stains. That is all you need.

Non powder laundry and dishwasher detergent. Powder is cheaper, leaves less residue and is much ecologically friendly than liquids or convenience packs. Try it, you will be amazed how much you save and how well they work.

Buying the cheapest or ‘best’ of anything.  If you buy the cheapest, expect it to break and you have to replace it way too often.  A complete waste of time and money.  Buying the best will cost you a lot also.  With every product there is a price versus quality curve.  This generally follows a bell curve and means you can pay 10 times more for an item, and it will only be twice the quality of the lesser priced item.  Use common sense on this one.

HP/Compaq computers.  Don’t be lured by the cheap prices versus features.  They are built like junk and are loaded with bloatware.

Expensive wines.  They all taste the same after about $20 a bottle, or even worse if they are improperly stored.  I’ll take a properly stored $5 California wine before a $200 improperly stored French wine.  A corked bottle of wine is horrible at any price.

Overpriced kitchen knives.  A $400 knife cuts about the same as a $15 one.  Pick the ones that work the best with your hands and cutting style.

If you can think of any more, drop me a line in the comments section.

 

 

 

 
Comments Off

Posted in General Comments

 

Updates

23 Mar

Turns out my web host is discontinuing support for MySQL 4 soon so I had to update some of my less used blogs.  Cyberphreak.com runs on the latest WordPress, so no worries there, but this allowed me to do a little culling from blogs I don’t update any more.  So, what is left standing?

http://www.cyberphreak.com/  Duh, that is where you are now.

http://watches.cyberphreak.com/  My watch site, gets more hits than the main site.

http://blindwino.cyberphreak.com/  My homage to Mark Driver, since his main blindwino.com disappeared years ago, I wanted an easy reference to his works.  Creepy on my part, but oh well.

http://zaurus.cyberphreak.com/  A lonely spot now.  I maintain it for the lonely Zaurus users out there.  The software feed still generates a fair amount of hits.

That is all for now.  Now that I am off Facebook, I should have more time to update the sites.  I also use twitter, you can follow me at:

https://twitter.com/Cyberphreak_Com

I also use Instagram quite a bit, you can follow me at:

http://instagram.com/sandbender1414/

If you are feeling old school, you can always e-mail me dave at cyberphreak dot com.

 

 
Comments Off

Posted in General Comments, Instagram

 

Blogging on the go

21 Mar

Earlier this week I received an unexpected gift, an Adesso bluetooth keyboard.  I have really been wanting a full keyboard for my phone or Palm Pilot, so now I finally have something usable.

The keys are about 3/4 size, about the same as a mini laptop or netbook, with good tactile response.  The overall height is amazingly thin, around a quarter of an inch!  It charges via USB, but looks like it works via bluetooth only.  I will post a follow up later once I have used it a while and get to know what the battery life is like.  For now, it is a great little toy, and large enough to touch type on.

image

 
Comments Off

Posted in Computers, On the Go

 

Photography, a personal journey, Part 3, digital matures.

14 Feb

This is part 3 of my photographic journey.  It is now November of 2000 and we finally have cameras that can rival film.

c3000

The C-3000 Zoom camera was finally a camera. Made by a camera company, with Olympus glass lenses, optical zoom, LCD viewfinder, and a flash that could light up a large room.   The optical viewfinder even had a diopter adjustment for people with glasses.  The image quality was surprisingly good, considering it was over 12 years ago!  I think the only major limitations were the SmartMedia card and the use of AA batteries.  SmartMedia cards maxed out at 128megs, which is not all that much for a 3.3 megapixel camera.   The AA batteries are surprisingly heavy, but available everywhere.

On the plus side, even now, the styling would not look out of place.  Great ergonomics and solid as heck.  Another really cool feature was the included IR remote, that could control the zoom and shutter.  A well used camera that taught me a lot.

Full specs are here.

Sample Images:

As you can see, the image quality is acceptable for all but the largest prints.  We had this camera from late 2000 to March 2004.  Cameras were improving a lot year to year in the mid 00′s, so it was time after almost 4 years to upgrade.

olympus_c5060_lcd

Ah, the C-5060WZ (Wide Zoom).  A heck of a camera that served us well for almost 8 years!  This was the camera that took Glenn’s (our son) first picture and hundreds of other important moments in our lives.  Rock solid magnesium body and an amazing twist-able, reversible LCD screen, great for versatile shooting.   Just shy of a SLR, it even had a hot shoe for an external flash.  Color reproduction was great, and it had a proper lithium-ion battery pack for extended shooting.  For a 5.1 megapixel, it took amazing photos, mostly due to the superior lenses.  Lasted over 30,000 shots before it developed a serious issue, the auto focus system failed.  It also had a IR remote and gobs of features even modern cameras lack.

Images taken two and a half years ago, during a beautiful fall day:

I remember taking the above photos, experimenting with exposure bracketing on the camera.  I was truly sad to see this camera go, but technology and good old fashioned wear and tear did it in.  For a while I used only my cell phone for photos.  More on that in the next post.

 
Comments Off

Posted in Photos

 

Black and White LaGrange 2013

13 Jan

A small gallery of some photos taken in La Grange, IL.  I wanted to experiment with black and white photography.  These photos were taken on an overcast day, so look oddly flat with no shadows.  Taken with a Canon PowerShot SX260 HS.  My first CMOS camera in a long time.

 
Comments Off

Posted in Photos

 

Photography, a personal journey, Part 2, digital infancy.

06 Jan

In part one, see below, I wrote about the film cameras I used growing up.  As an adult, I was introduced to digital cameras.  In the beginning, they really could not compare to film.  With comically low resolutions, as low as 320×240, they were useless for prints.  However, once the ball started rolling, it never stopped.

Jam Cam 2.0

The JamCam 2.0.  Our first digital camera.  More or less a toy, it could take 320×240 or 648×480 photos and store them in internal memory.  It could store up to 8 photos at ‘full’ resolution.  I, however, don’t regret getting this camera and have some fond memories of taking photos with it.  Very rugged and I don’t think we ever changed the batteries.  Optical viewfinder with just an 7 segment lcd on the back showing you how many shots you had left.  Serial RS-232 interface with no memory expansion.  The 3.0 version could have MultiMedia card, but our version did not.  Owned from early November 1999 to late April 2000.  Even then we knew at the time the photos were just unacceptable and the camera was soon replaced with an I/O magic MagicImage 500.

Specs:

 	Real resolution: 640 x 480 
 	Maximum picture capacity: 24 
 	Power: 9V alkaline battery- Not included
    Resolution and Display Capacity

Display Resolution Picture Capacity
r1 640 x 480 8
r2 320 x 240 26
r3 240 x 179 48

 

Sample Shots:

Luckily, it looks like we took photos at the Museum of Science and Industry Chicago with most of the cameras we have owned over the years, so you can really see how far the technology has come.  Only outdoor shots looked halfway decent, and color reproduction was very poor in low light.

iomagic500

 

 

Our next camera (in case you are wondering, us means the wife and I) was an I/O Magic Magicimage 500.  A big step up from the JamCam.  0.8 mega-pixels native, 1.3 interpolated.  The flash worked well and the image quality was somewhat acceptable for web images, with the possibility of printing actual photos with it.  We took many photos with the camera, and, luckily it was expandable with 3.3V Smart Media cards.  It could also take macro photos, for the first time.   It used AA batteries, and had decent battery life without the flash.  Used as primary camera from April 2000 to November 2000.

Specifications:

  • Resolution 0.8 megapixels / 1.2 megapixels (interpolated)
  • Total Pixels 800000.0 pixels
  • Optical Sensor Size 1/3″
  • Image Recording Format JPEG
  • Lens System

    • Type – F/2.8
    • Focal Length Equivalent to 35mm Camera 47.0 mm
    • Min Focus Range 4.3 ft

Sample Photos:

The photos are better, but still not what I would call printable.  In November of 2000, we bought our first non toy digital camera, the Olympus C-3000.  More on that in the next post.

 
Comments Off

Posted in Photos

 

Photography, a personal journey, Part 1, film

06 Jan

I have always loved taking pictures.  I am not a professional or even a rank amateur, but I still have always enjoyed taking snapshots and photos in general.  I am not an early adopter of much, but digital cameras were the exception.  When I was younger (and up until I was about 24 or so) digital cameras were more science fiction than practical devices.  So, when I was a growing up, there was nothing but film.

This was the first camera that I used, the Kodak Instamatic 100.  I am sure many of the early photos of my life were taken with a camera like this.  I still remember the packages that the one use flash bulbs came in.  That’s right, you had to replace the flash bulb with every flash photo, well, every 4 photos with the magic flash cube.  Very simple, but it took good photos and it was super easy to get film for it.  (Did not own, was family camera.)

Ah, yes, the disk camera.  A real marvel of engineering.  Pocket sized, built in flash, kinda crappy photo quality.  The disks we very easy to use, and you almost never accidentally destroyed the negatives by mishandling.  The downside is with such small negatives, the film grain was pretty obvious and low light without the flash on was pointless.  The camera size, however, was very convenient.  (Did not own, was a family camera.)

Yet another Kodak.  You have to remember, before digital cameras, Kodak was king.  I used a camera like this in my late early 20′s.  Very good image quality and a neat feature of panoramic shots.  24mm film negatives meant decent film grain and the film itself was easy.  You just dropped it in and went along with life.  When it hit the end of the roll, it automatically rewound the film and you didn’t need to carry the little round 35mm canisters.  Decent flash and good low light capabilities.  Only recently discontinued, it was the last point and shoot holdout in traditional film.   (Not owned, friends’ camera.)

 

That last film camera I have used, and, shockingly, still in production.  The Fujifilm QuickSnap disposeable camera.  Just take your shots, drop off the whole camera to get the film developed, and you are done.  No film to handle, no batteries to replace.  Takes shockinly good looking photos.  A great way to use traditional film, or, if you are cheap, have a camera you really don’t care about if it gets destroyed.  Dirt simple to use, tough, and even comes in waterproof versions.   

This was the last film camera I have handled.  I also used some traditional 35mm point and shoots, but nothing that stands out in my mind.  Next post will be on my transition to digital with sample photos.  Ah, yes, digital.  13 years later the photos still look exactly how you took them originally. 

 
Comments Off

Posted in Political

 

Okay is not Good Enough

22 Dec

 A couple of months ago Microsoft released Windows 8. Well, they released Windows 8 RT, Windows 8 32 bit, Windows 8 64 bit, Windows 8 Pro 32 bit, Windows 8 Pro 64 bit, Windows 8 Enterprise 32 bit, and Windows 8 Enterprise 64 bit. I have read and viewed and personally tried Windows 8 (64 bit, I think). Some people hate it (like me), others merely tolerate it, some people actually like it.

Personally, I feel it is one of the least intuitive, least polished operating system GUI’s I have ever encountered. The transition from Modern UI to classic desktop is jarring and really unfinished. The controls are hodgepodge and inconstant. Hidden controls abound and make little logical sense. Heck, even shutting down the machine does not make sense. But, despite my personal views (and I have been using computers a long time), most professional reviewers miss one thing. Windows 8, at best, is poor on the desktop, pretty decent on tablets, and just okay, overall. That does not cut it in this day and age.

Personal computers with GUI’s have been around for over 25 years. Companies like Apple, Red Hat, Palm (dead), and Google and Organizations like X.org, KDE, and Ubuntu have all been developing desktop and mobile environments during most or all of this time. For the desktop, Apple’s OSX, Linux KDE, GNOME, LXDE, Cinnamon, and Unity are all elegant, easy to use designs. For portable devices, Apple’s iOs and Google’s Android, both derivatives of Palm OS, are perfectly matched to smaller screen environments. Microsoft’s own Windows XP and 7 are well matched for the desktop environment, functional, if not the most aesthetic implementations. There is a reason there is quite a dichotomy between the two. What works for one does not work as well for another. Microsoft tried to blend the two and ended up with bipolar acting GUI. To be honest, they didn’t blend them at all, you are just tossed back and forth between the two competing paradigms. In the end, you still have an okay experience.

On the desktop, why would you choose a hobbled system over OSX, Unity, or KDE? All of the alternatives are much better and you can find everything. On portable devices, you can argue Windows 8 is a decent choice, but is it really easier to use than the classic design of iOS and Android? Palm figured it out 15 years ago and it still works now. Okay is just not acceptable when very, very worthy and mature competitors are out there. I honestly don’t know what Microsoft was thinking when they released Windows 8 in its current form. This isn’t 1998, and you can’t release half baked software just because you are a monopoly. You are not a monopoly on portable devices or even a major player. Very risky, to the point of reducing Microsoft to another IBM. Stable, but a second or third class player behind Apple and Google.

I am very glad I made the switch to Linux many years ago do I don’t have to worry about the silly Windows shenanigans. For anyone who has made the upgrade to Windows 8, why did you do it, and was it worth it?

 

 

 
Comments Off

Posted in Computers

 

FocusWrite

19 Aug

Finally, a simple word processor. I have found that over the years, I type less and less for my blog, and for enjoyment in general. Why is this? Well, for one, I really do think there are just too many distractions for doing some real writing. Even trying to type a watch review was a real chore. So, I went looking for something simpler, cleaner, and with less distractions. What I found was FocusWriter. It is available for Windows, Mac, and of course, Linux. What it is gives you is just what you see in the screen shot. A blank page to write on. You can import or create your own themes. Another neat feature is the fact you can set goals for yourself. Number of words, minutes of typing, etc. It is full screen, so no e-mail notifications, or instant messengers. I even have it set up to sound like an old typewriter, which this really reminds me of. When I was a kid, that is all you had to make professional looking documents. Computers and word-processors did not arrive on the scene until the mid 80’s. The program I learned to word process on was WordPerfect for DOS. It was a simple interface as well. No buttons, doodads , and almost distraction free.

This is WordPerfect for DOS:

This is OpenOffice Writer 3.4:

This is FocusWriter:

See the difference? For a little fun, I created a theme very reminiscent of WordPerfect for DOS.

However, what I usually use is this:


It is the classic green characters on a very dark screen, much easier on the eyes than a bright, wight screen, with dark letters.
Give it a try, you may like it.  It is even available for Windows and Mac.

 
Comments Off

Posted in Computers

 

Sorry Old Friend

08 Aug

For many, many years I was a Mandriva Linux user.  In fact, I started back in 1999, with Mandrake (former name) 6.0, which I purchased, in box form, from Microcenter.  This was after a really revealing hack on my Windows 98 machine.  Since then, I have never looked back.  I dual booted between the two for a while, but after 2002 or so, I made the complete switch.  For the last 13 years I stuck with Mandrake, then Mandriva Linux for my main computer until about 3 weeks ago.  The transition away from Mandriva started on our netbook.

About six months ago, I got fed up with the performance of Mandriva 2011 on my netbook, so I tried something different, Ubuntu 10.04,  For the beginning, it was a much better match to the hardware.  Everything worked with minimal muss and fuss.  The Lenovo S10 never ran better.  Battery life was not great, but acceptable.  Fast forward to a few weeks ago, and my desktop machine just stopped working.  I was running Mandriva 2011, which is now a KDE only desktop system.  I had a lot of quirks, had to compile the nVidia driver myself, and it just was always on the cusp of crashing.  Not something you want on your main computer.  I had a combination of hardware failure, something on the motherboard, and a corrupt home partition.  I figured, screw it, I really like Ubuntu on the netbook, how about I try it on my main machine?

I have to say, I was very pleasantly surprised.  Everything worked out of the box, including the nVidia proprietary drivers.  Unlike the ailing Mandriva, Ubuntu has a very healthy support community, and they support their LTS (Long Term Support) installations for FIVE years.  Pretty impressive for free.  I opted for the Unity (gnome based) desktop environment.  I have seen complaints about it being too cell phone like, but, to be honest, it is nice having a unified interface between my phone, netbook, and desktop computer.  It is simple and quick to use, even for an old salt like me.  The package management system, and how many packages are available, are outstanding.

Looking back now, I don’t know why I put up with the poorly supported and infrequently updated Mandriva.  I wish them nothing but the best, but I see why Ubuntu is the most popular.  Heck, even Suse is much better supported.  I have found it compares very favorably compared to Windows 7, and is much more polished and modern than Windows XP.

 
Comments Off

Posted in Computers